Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Synod V


Well, I don't really know how to comment on last night. It was a very draining, with Synod running over time. I think we managed to get a lot of work done, and yet we also wasted a lot of time discussing amendments to motions for up to 20 minutes, only to see those amendemnts more than convincingly defeated.

we ehard of the amazing work God is doing in Uganda, Nigeria and South East Asia, and were addressed by the Archbishop of Singapore. The Indigenous Representation motion and Nomiantion motion passed as ordinance's, and we apporved the Regions amendment motion.

Of most interest last night was PeterJensen's address about the future of the Anglican Communion and Sydney's role in that. Peter said that basically the communion would never be the same again, and has already devolved into a loose federation of churches.

"I have always said that it is more likely that we will see its devolution into a looser federation of churches, networking across old lines in new ways. Indeed, I think that this has now begun to occur," and "As a consequence, I do not think that the office of the Archbishop of Canterbury while, of course, very important, will regain its old place."

Following this, we apporved two motions last night, one which encouraged the diocese to partner with other like-minded dioceses, and the other motion, which read:

"Synod notes with regret the discord within the Anglican Communion, commits itself to prayer for the unity of the Anglican Communion under God, commends the Primates of the Global South for their forthright stand in upholding biblical truth, expresses its support and encouragement for all within the Anglican Communion who are seeking to uphold biblical principles and prays for the Archbishop of Canterbury in his difficult role."

On a lighter side, i was accused by a certain regional bishop of reading science fiction during synod...the fact that it was G.B. Caird and the book was my dinner companion is beside the point. Oh well, bring on tonight's media circus.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why were you reading science fiction in Synod? lol.

- Laurence

Matthew Moffitt said...

G.B. Caird isn't, as far as I know, science fiction, unless you count "The Language and Imagery of the Bible" as sci-fi.