Language
is important. The language we deploy shapes our imagination of how we perceive
the world and ourselves. Christians, committed as we are to an ontological and
moral realism in creation, have a peculiar interest in the way we use language.
We hope that our language reflects the order God has created, preserved,
redeemed, and will one day prefect, all for the sake of his Son. This is a
humble project; the finiteness of our creaturely minds, and the disordering of
our hearts, makes us dependent upon revelation to be to understand the world.
The way Christians speak of themselves and the world around them is contingent
upon God’s revelation to us in Christ Jesus, the one through whom and for whom
all things were made. It is the particular work of the Holy Spirit to renew our
minds, thereby freeing us to attend to and participate in this moral order.
One
contemporary linguistic glitch in the Christian world today is the way in which
Christian’s are described as “saints and sinners”, or using the term coined by
German reformer Martin Luther, simul iustus et peccator. This phrase
seeks to capture the ongoing presence of sin in a believer’s life, alongside
the reality that in Christ they are cleansed and renewed. It gives account of
one’s experience besides gospel truth.
It
is curious to note though the absence of the term “sinner” in Paul’s description
of Christians. Whilst “saint” is used throughout the Pauline corpus to describe
Christians, including six of Paul’s introductions (Romans 1.7; 1 Corinthians
1.2; 2 Corinthians 1.1; Ephesians 1.1; Philippians 1.1; Colossians 1.2), the
term “sinner” is nowhere used to describe those who belong to Jesus. This is not to deny the ongoing presence of
sin in a believer’s life. The task of sanctification and perfection is ongoing.
Sin may mar our lives, but we are charged with presenting our bodies in worship
for the renewing of our minds, the re-ordering of our heart as St Augustine
would put it. We who live according to the Spirit no longer live according to
flesh; we are to walk in the light, and not the darkness. What is most true of
us is not sin, because it has no mastery over us. Despite the presence of sin
in my life, I am not sinner, but a saint who trusts that the same God who
justified me will bring that work to completion in my sanctification. The gospel shows me that I am much more broken and stained by sin then you could ever imagine;. Yet his grace has appeared; God has adopted me as his child, declaring me to be a saint of the Most High.
It
seems then that the description of saints as sinners is a category error. Archbishop
Glenn Davies comments that:
“Clearly
the Bible affirms the presence of sin in the life of the believer will continue
until their death, but this is not to be equated with the term ‘sinner’. […] To
use the term ‘sinner’ is to fly in the face of the whole teaching of the Bible,
that those who belong to God’s people are ‘the righteous’ and not ‘the
wicked’.”
The
Apostle Peter, following the lead of Psalm 1.5, uses this dichotomy of
wicked/sinner against the righteous in his first letter:
‘If
it is hard for the righteous to be saved, what will become of the ungodly and
the sinners?’ (1 Peter 4.18)
Biblically
and theologically, we are dealing with two diametrically opposed categories:
saints and sinners. Those in Christ, and those outside of him. To
be a sinner, is to be, as Luther described it, self-enclosed – incurvatus in
se. But conversion and repentance is the beginning of a reordering of our
love. Apprehending Christ’s work of salvation done to me and for me, we cease
being curved in upon ourselves, as we are sanctified in him. Clearly then,
Christians can only belong to one of these theologically laden categories.
If
language matters, then the practice of describing believers as “sinners” is
dangerous. We are allowing our experience to drive our theology. The reality is
that through our union with Christ, we are ontologically and theologically
speaking freed from slavery to sin. As the poet Gerard Manley Hopkins described
it, “I am all at once what Christ is, ' since he was what I am”. If anyone does
sin, our advocate in heaven is able to cleanse us, and the perfecting work of the Spirit
continues to redirect our desires towards Christ. I take that the part played by regular
confession in corporate worship inducts into this dynamic of sanctification and
grace; us we hear the call to repent, make confession of our sins, and assured
of our forgiveness, we respond with praise and thanksgiving to our God and his
Son who freed us and cleansed us by his blood. When we call one another “sinner”,
we fly in the face of this glorious gospel truth: that Jesus, the friend of sinners,
died my death, securing my adoption by our heavenly Father. We are saints of
the Most High. For Christ's sake, will you stop calling me a sinner?
9 comments:
Would there be an issue with Rowan Williams repeatedly praying the Jesus prayer? (“Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy upon me, a sinner”)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10942056/Rowan-Williams-how-Buddhism-helps-me-pray.html
Hi Lachlan, I haven't read the article yet, but personally, I would be more inclined to use the prayer that is used in the prayer book, the Kyrie eleison:
Lord have mercy
Christ have mercy
Lord have mercy
Where is the ++Davies quote from?
The Briefing, January 2006, page 30.
Thanks!
What of James 4:8:
"Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double- minded."
James 4:8 needs to be read in the context of James 1.5-8. The use of ἁμαρτωλοί is therefore quite evocative, addressed specifically to those acting like unbelievers, not trust God and therefore shipwrecking there faith. Also, ἁμαρτωλοί is an adjective, and should probably be translated "sinful" rather than "sinner", the point Glenn Davies makes in his letter in The Briefing
And 1 Timothy 1:15:
"The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost."
It seems though that firstly is is a peculiarly Pauline statement to make, that given his history, only he himself can make. Secondly, Paul uses the present tense as Tom notes, for εἰμί. The present tense draws you into the action of vv.12-14, 16, and coupled with the aorist infinitive σῶσαι, this is Paul reflecting he back. He was the worst of sinners, but is now a redeemed sinner, judged faithful (v.12).
1 John is an interesting case in point. John does not deny the ongoing presence of sin in the life of a believer, to do so would be as you say make God out to be a liar (1.10), along with deceiving ourselves (1:8). Christ alone has the power to cleanse us from our sin (1:7,9; 2:1-2). John seems to expect sin in the Christian life and tells us what to to about it. At the same time, he's able to make a statement like this in 3:9:
"No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God's seed abides in him, and he cannot keep on sinning because he has been born of God."
Good stuff, Matt.
Post a Comment